Fahrenheit 9/11 - what is incorrect or misleading?
I watched Fahrenheit 9/11 last night online.
I thought the film was interesting, and I've been working on a blog about the Bush Dynasty, especially their finances. Most of what Moore talked about in that regard I have found else where on the web. I don't think there is much argument about the fact that the Bush family is into Oil, and you can't be in the Oil Business with out being tied with the Saudis. I mean really, you can't deny that the two go hand in hand.
I think it is unfortunate that the President and his family have had a long term relationship with the family of the world’s most infamous terrorist, but their relationship goes back way before bin Laden was a terrorist. I think it does put GWB in a compromising position. I'm not sure why he ran for President knowing that these types of allegations could arise. I also don't think I would seek office again if I knew by doing so I would probably have to seek out the son of a friend and business partner and kill him if it came to that. But he did and we elected him. So gods bless him and his resolve.
What I don't understand is why Michael Moore makes Republicans recoil in horror at the mention of his name. After dinner this evening I mentioned to my step dad, a republican, that I had seen the movie and that it was both interesting and a bit over the top. I think that's a very fair statement. Being a moderate independent I think I have a clearer eye than most Democrats or Republicans.
I told step dad I was looking into the Bush Family finances for a blog I was working on, and he looked at me like I just killed god. I told him about the Prescott Bush information that I had found, and he told me it was a lie. I told him the Alien Seizure vesting order 248 specifically named Prescott Bush and the Union Banking company. I told him about the New York Times article that stated the firm had been relocated to the Alien Seizure Custodian offices but buried the seizure, which was quite out of the ordinary. Again he denied it as Leftist BS. I mean it's a matter of public record. Hundreds of records are entered in the US Alien Property records in the Justice Department records. Why would this be falsified?
I told him that I had also looked into the Carlyle Group and could verify on their own web page that George Bush Senior was in fact on the board as was a bin Laden only a few years ago. But again I was waved off as some kind of nut. I don't get it. I reminded him of Neil Bush's incontrovertible link to the S&L Crisis. I pointed out that George Bush Sr, had lied repeatedly about his involvement in Iran Contra, and that this had all been made public record in the commission report, and that entries in Bushes personal diary from the time made specific mention of meetings with Ollie North and John Poindexter despite his testimony otherwise. I decided that I had pushed his blood pressure to the safe limit, and backed down before it became an all out argument. But it makes me wonder....
So for you republicans that have seen F911 what is it exactly that you refute? I just want to get a feel for the republican take on the film.
Please do not say things like Michael Moore is a liar - or he's full of crap. I want specifics of what he said, and why it is false. I'd like a non confrontational discussion so if you’re not capable of that please move along. Think of this as not an opportunity to defend President Bush, but more of a chance to enlighten me (a non combatant at least on this blog) and set the record straight.